Primitive Classification contains the first attempt by Durkheim and Mauss to develop a. French version of the sociology of knowl- edge. I have chosen to deal with. In this influential work, first published in English in , Durkheim and Mauss claim that the individual mind is capable of classification and they seek the origin . Essays and criticism on Émile Durkheim, Marcel Mauss’ Primitive Classification – Critical Essays.
|Published (Last):||16 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||17.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Science Logic and Mathematics. Find it on Scholar. Dewey Decimal Classification for Indology: Prospects for a Psychoevolutionary Approach. Selected Writings in Social Theory. Various – – Routledge.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
I think that these two principles can help to explain a lot of quirky features of contemporary social theory. Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
And even when abstract dualisms are provisionally allowed e. No categories specified categorize this paper.
This entry has no external links. Stephen Paling – unknown.
Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge. Charles Starkey – – Philosophical Psychology 21 6: Ebach – – Palgrave-Macmillan.
Scott Atran – – Journal of the History of Biology 20 2: Origin of the Species and Genus Concepts: They are wrong because our classificattion classification of persons tends to reject dualisms at least in the humanities and some social sciences. Sign in Create an account.
Classification, Rhetoric, and the Classificatory Horizon.
Durkheim and Mauss went on to argue for instance, that if persons divided themselves into two groups, then they divided the world of animals, plants, etc. Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 40 3: Second, that the style of classification of persons should result in an analogous style of classifying things.
Emile Durkheim & Marcel Mauss, Primitive Classification – PhilPapers
From this it follows, that resistance to classify persons in a hierarchical manner should result in an equal resistance to classify things in a hierarchical way. Sharma – – Ess Ess Publications. Request removal from index. I think that we e.
Categories and Classifications Maussian Reflections on the Social. Written by Omar November 27, at 9: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 2: By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
No keywords specified fix it. From this they argue that the mode of classification is determined by the form of society and that the notions of space, time, hierarchy, number, class and other such cognitive categories are products of society.
Daniel Parrochia – – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Instead, I think that this hunch, is in effect a form of Primitive Classification unique to certain collectives in the social and human sciences most other sciences and most other lay persons have no problem with dualisms and hierarchical privileging of one abstract thing over the other.
Sign in to use this feature. From the Universe of Knowledge to the Universe of Concepts: Interactive Classification and Practice in the Social Sciences. History of Western Philosophy. Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences.
Mauss – – Les Etudes Philosophiques 19 3: Jack Mills – unknown. Charles Lindholm – – Ethos: This argument holds with two minor elaborations: Drabek – – Poroi 6 2: Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.